Principio De Legalidad En Venezuela Que Es

  • Post author:
  • Post category:Uncategorized

/December). “The principle of legality”. Revista Española de Derecho Constitucional (Madrid: Centro de Estudios Políticos y Constitucionals) (39): 9-42. This relationship between the principle of legality and that of the reservation of rights is generally established – in a democracy – in the so-called legal system and is treated in a particularly dogmatic way in constitutional, administrative, tax and criminal law. Serve a sentence so that those involved in the sentence can repeat the crime that may have arisen. According to the principle of legality in criminal law: Paul Johann Anselm von Feuerbach established this principle in criminal law on the basis of the maxim nullum crime, nulla poena sine praevia lege, i.e. in order for conduct to qualify as a criminal offence, it must be described as such before committing the conduct, and the penalty imposed must be determined in advance by law. In tax law, on the basis of the principle of legality, only such a legal rule can define each individual element of the tax liability, namely the chargeable event, the entities liable to pay, the system or basis for determining the chargeable event, the time of payment, infringements, penalties and exemptions, and the entity legalized to receive payment of taxes. The Latin maxim nullum tributum sine legem states that to be considered as such, a tribute must be contained in a law, otherwise it is not a tribute. Finally, it should be noted that, in the criminal world, the principle of legality refers to a legal principle according to which an act or omission can be punished only if it is provided for as a crime by law. The fundamental basis of constitutional law, which requires that certain important issues can only be settled by law in order to ensure that they pass through the plural discussions that exist in each legislative branch. It should not be understood as a mere formality, but as an opportunity for representatives of popular sovereignty to duly discuss particularly important issues. In Venezuela, this fundamental principle can be ignored in terms of content from the moment a law can be passed that allows the president to dictate laws on all matters of what happened and produced laws that were published without public discussion.

Example: “An example of the principle of legality is that criminal offences can only be established by law.” This principle is also enshrined in criminal science, in Article 1(1) of the Criminal Code: No act or omission may be punished. At present, however, it is considered that it is the law that positively determines and determines the administrative act, which is not valid if it does not comply with a normative provision in force. The principle of legality then acts as a prior legal cover for any power: if the administration cooperates with it, its actions are legitimate (doctrine of positive link). [1] In general, this implies that all public authorities and citizens are subject to the law and can only do what is or is not prohibited by law. The principle of legality is linked to other general principles of law. The principle of legality is a fundamental principle used by most States, according to which any exercise of official authority must be carried out in accordance with the law in force and its jurisdiction, and not according to the will of the people. If a state adheres to this principle, then the actions of its powers are subject to the Constitution and the current state or rule of law. However, it is for the Court to verify the existence of a prima facie case or periculum in mora, in respect of which it is found that, in the abovementioned application for precautionary protection, the applicant referred, in his statement of concrete facts, to flagrant violations such as the rights of the defence, due process guarantees and the principle of constitutional legality.

The Civil Cassation Chamber of the Supreme Court usurps legislative functions; distorted the nature, meaning and scope of diffuse review of constitutionality and reliance on failure to legislate; violated the principle of separation of powers and the principle of legality; usurps the powers of the Constitutional Chamber and violates due process guarantees and the rights of the defence. Keywords: Control 3. The Constitution guarantees the principle of legality, the hierarchy of norms, the publication of norms, the prohibition of retroactivity of provisions on sanctions that do not promote or restrict the rights of individuals, legal certainty, liability and the prohibition of arbitrariness of public authorities. Within the framework of the principle of legality, it acts in conjunction with the principle of the general interest, according to which the private interest must give way to the public or social interest, and with the principle of the separation of powers, according to which the public authority is divided into bodies with specific and limited functions for each of them. This is one of the principles on which administrative law is based, that is, that applicable to public administration. The importance of the principle of legality is undisputed in all areas, but especially in administrative law. Among other things, because the administration must adhere to a hierarchical legal system according to this principle. Content: the elements that make up the principle of legality. On the one hand, it can be examined from a formal point of view and in its material importance, taking into account the literal content of legality: The principle of legality is reflected in the following constitutional requirements: The principle of legality consists in giving precedence to the law over any activity or function of public authority. The constitutional principle of legality in tax matters implies that the creation, modification and abolition of taxes, as well as the granting of tax exemptions and other tax advantages, the determination of the chargeable event, taxpayers, teachers and source holders, the corresponding tax rates and the tax base must be carried out by law.